When Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. started his tenure as Well being and Human Companies Secretary, he pledged, “We gained’t take away anybody’s vaccines.” Nevertheless, current coverage modifications underneath his management—coupled with the unprecedented dismissal of all 17 members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) on June 9—have confirmed that assertion false, elevating grave considerations for our nation’s COVID-19 response and broader vaccine insurance policies. These shifts not solely jeopardize public well being but in addition threaten to erode belief in our well being establishments at a vital time.
In Might 2025, the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) launched a brand new COVID-19 vaccine framework, limiting entry to up to date vaccines for Individuals aged 65 and older or these with particular danger components. Moreover, Secretary Kennedy introduced that the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC) would not advocate COVID-19 vaccines for “wholesome” kids or pregnant ladies—bypassing the usual ACIP evaluate course of.
Compounding these modifications, the abrupt elimination of ACIP’s whole panel of impartial consultants, who’ve guided evidence-based vaccine coverage for many years, dangers destabilizing a cornerstone of public well being. These actions collectively prohibit entry to a significant device for saving lives and undermine confidence in our well being techniques.
Learn Extra: What to Know About RFK Jr. Eradicating All Consultants From CDC Vaccine Advisory Committee
Throughout my tenure as Surgeon Normal underneath the primary Trump administration, we confronted important public well being challenges, from addressing the opioid epidemic by growing entry to Naloxone to launching Operation Warp Pace for the COVID-19 vaccine growth effort. The vaccines developed underneath Trump’s first time period have confirmed to be certainly one of our best defenses towards COVID-19; but, the present administration’s new insurance policies restrict their availability, probably leaving thousands and thousands weak. The dismissal of ACIP’s consultants—and not using a clear plan for changing them with certified scientists—additional jeopardizes belief within the establishments tasked with defending Individuals.
The most important flaw within the new vaccine framework is its slender evaluation of danger. Though the rapid risks of COVID-19 have lessened, it stays a number one explanation for demise and hospitalization, claiming practically 50,000 lives within the U.S. in 2024—greater than breast most cancers or automobile accidents. The actual fact is, 75% of Individuals have danger components, corresponding to weight problems or diabetes, that improve their vulnerability to extreme COVID outcomes. Nevertheless, the burden is now positioned on people to self-identify as excessive danger, creating confusion and inconsistency in entry. In contrast to different international locations with centralized techniques for figuring out at-risk people, the U.S. expects sufferers—lots of whom lack quick access to healthcare—to navigate eligibility alone.
Danger evaluation also needs to think about particular person circumstances past underlying well being circumstances. A 58-year-old bus driver or healthcare employee faces considerably better publicity than somebody working remotely. By limiting vaccines to particular teams primarily based solely on preexisting well being standing, the coverage overlooks these vital contextual variations.
Secretary Kennedy’s workforce argues that there’s inadequate proof to help up to date COVID-19 vaccines for wholesome Individuals underneath 65, however this declare is flatly unfounded. Years of real-world knowledge reveal that vaccines save lives and cut back hospitalizations throughout all age teams. In the course of the 2023 to 2024 fall and winter season, 95% of these hospitalized for COVID had not obtained an up to date vaccine. Whereas the administration cites different international locations’ extra restrictive vaccine insurance policies, such comparisons ignore the distinctive well being panorama within the U.S., which incorporates increased weight problems charges, worse maternal well being outcomes, and uneven healthcare entry.
The coverage additionally neglects the difficulty of Lengthy COVID, which impacts thousands and thousands with debilitating signs lasting months or years. Although older adults are at increased danger for extreme acute infections, Lengthy COVID disproportionately impacts adults aged 35 to 49—and kids are additionally affected. Vaccination reduces the danger of growing Lengthy COVID, an important cause many wholesome people select to remain up-to-date with their vaccines.
Learn Extra: What’s the Danger of Getting Lengthy COVID in 2024?
Notably regarding is the choice to finish COVID vaccine suggestions for “wholesome” pregnant ladies, which contradicts the FDA’s personal steering. Pregnant ladies face heightened dangers of extreme COVID outcomes, together with demise, pre-eclampsia, and miscarriage. Vaccination throughout being pregnant is essential—not only for maternal well being but in addition for defending infants underneath six months, who can’t be vaccinated and depend on maternal antibodies for defense. A long time of analysis affirm that vaccines, together with COVID vaccines, safely switch antibodies to newborns, decreasing their danger of extreme sickness.
The dismissal of ACIP’s members amplifies these considerations. ACIP has been a trusted, science-driven physique that ensures vaccines are protected and efficient, saving numerous lives by means of its clear suggestions. Its members, rigorously vetted for experience and conflicts of curiosity, present impartial steering vital to public well being. Eradicating them with out clear proof of misconduct dangers changing certified scientists with much less skilled voices. This transfer fuels vaccine hesitancy and skepticism about public well being selections, significantly when paired with the bypassing of ACIP’s evaluate course of for the brand new COVID vaccine insurance policies.
These modifications create uncertainty about who can entry vaccines. With out clear CDC suggestions, insurance coverage corporations could impose their very own protection standards, probably growing prices for a vaccine that was beforehand free for many Individuals. Healthcare suppliers, missing federal steering and ACIP’s experience, could wrestle to advise sufferers, resulting in a complicated and inequitable system that limits selection—hardly the “medical freedom” Secretary Kennedy claims to champion.
Finally, these actions threaten to erode belief in public well being. FDA officers argue the brand new framework enhances transparency, but bypassing ACIP’s evaluate and dismissing its members undermines that purpose. In depth knowledge reveal that up to date vaccines decrease hospitalization and demise charges, but this proof was sidelined. Such actions breed skepticism, making it tougher to unite Individuals round shared well being targets.
The stakes are excessive, however a greater path is feasible. Restoring belief requires clear, evidence-based policymaking that prioritizes entry to life-saving instruments. I urge Secretary Kennedy and the administration to rethink this framework, reinstate ACIP’s function in vaccine coverage, and guarantee any new appointees are certified, impartial consultants. If considerations about ACIP exist, they need to be addressed by means of reform, not dissolution. Healthcare suppliers and group leaders should additionally educate sufferers about vaccination advantages, significantly for weak teams like pregnant ladies and people with excessive publicity. People can take motion by staying knowledgeable, discussing vaccination with their docs, and advocating for clear, equitable entry to vaccines.
By working collectively—authorities, suppliers, and residents—we are able to defend lives, cut back the burden of Lengthy COVID, and rebuild confidence in our public well being system. We should seize this chance to unite round science and guarantee a more healthy, safer, and affluent future for all Individuals.
Discussion about this post